Skip to main content
GWGovwatch
CongressBillsCommitteesPresidentMoneyPulseMisconductElectionsMap
Donate

Weekly accountability digest

One email a week with new votes, moving bills, and misconduct updates. No spam.

GW

Govwatch. Public data about Congress, in one place, in plain English.

Built with public data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Explore

  • Officials
  • Legislation
  • Committees
  • Congress Pulse
  • Trending Topics
  • Bipartisan Leaderboard
  • Weekly Digest
  • Misconduct
  • Predictions

Learn

  • How Congress Works
  • How a Bill Becomes Law
  • Campaign Finance 101
  • Glossary

Tools

  • My Representatives
  • Compare Members
  • Bill Watchlist
  • Search
  • District Map
  • Follow the Money
  • Watch Live

Site

  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Data Sources

Congress.gov API v3
Bills, members, votes
GovInfo API
Floor speeches, reports, bill text
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
Campaign finance
VoteView (UCLA)
Ideology scores (DW-NOMINATE)
GovTrack.us
Misconduct data (CC0)
U.S. Census Bureau
District demographics
Support This Project

This site is free. Donations help cover hosting, API fees, and keeping the data fresh.

All data is sourced from official government APIs and public records. This site is for informational purposes only.

© 2026 Govwatch

HR6506Passed House

Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act

Share:
Introduced
In Committee
Passed One Chamber
4
Passed Both
5
Signed into Law
119th
Congress
2025-12-09
Introduced
1
Cosponsors
HR
ⓘ
Type

Sponsor

Nathaniel Moran
Nathaniel Moran
Republican · TX · Representative
Votes with party: 98.9% (543 recorded votes)

Full profile: /officials/M001224

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

Cosponsors (1)

Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.

  • Terri A. Sewell (D-AL-7)Original· 2025-12-09

Latest Action

The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

2026-05-20

Source: Congress.gov

Committee Activity

Currently in

  • Senate Committee on FinanceReferred To · 2026-05-20
  • House Committee on Ways and MeansReported By · 2026-01-07

Previously

  • Ways and Means CommitteeReported By · 2026-01-07
  • Ways and Means CommitteeMarkup By · 2025-12-10
  • House Committee on Ways and MeansMarkup By · 2025-12-10
  • Ways and Means CommitteeReferred To · 2025-12-09
  • House Committee on Ways and MeansReferred To · 2025-12-09

Plain-English Summary

Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act This bill suspends the period of time allowed for claiming a federal tax refund (limitations period) during collection due process (CDP) proceedings, prohibits the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from applying tax overpayments to a tax liability that is disputed in such proceedings, and expands the Tax Court’s jurisdiction. As background, IRS collection actions and the underlying tax liability (in some circumstances) may be disputed in a CDP hearing. Collection actions are suspended during CDP proceedings, but the IRS may apply tax overpayments from other tax years to the disputed tax liability. The Tax Court may review an appeal of a CDP hearing determination. However, the Supreme Court held in Commissioner v. Zuch that the Tax Court loses jurisdiction over a CDP appeal if the CDP hearing determination is revoked because tax overpayments are applied to and fully satisfy the tax liability. In such circumstances, the taxpayer may claim a refund and seek redress in federal district court. Currently, the limitations period to file a refund claim is not suspended during CDP proceedings. The bill suspends the limitations period for claiming a tax refund during CDP proceedings (with exceptions), prohibits the IRS from applying tax overpayments to a properly disputed tax liability during CDP proceedings (unless waived or an exception applies), expands the Tax Court's jurisdiction in CDP cases to include jurisdiction over the underlying tax liability amount (if properly disputed), and provides that the Tax Court retains its jurisdiction if the IRS abandons collection actions.

Plain-English rewrite of the Congressional Research Service summary published on Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed.

Subjects

Taxation

Full Bill Text

Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 6506 Reported in House (RH)] <DOC> Union Calendar No. 373 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6506 [Report No. 119-428] To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend the period of limitations on filing a claim for credit or refund during collection action proceedings, to prohibit the crediting of overpayments against disputed tax liability during such proceedings, and to expand the jurisdiction of the Tax Court. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES December 9, 2025 Mr. Moran (for himself and Ms. Sewell) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means January 7, 2026 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on December 9, 2025] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend the period of limitations on filing a claim for credit or refund during collection action proceedings, to prohibit the crediting of overpayments against disputed tax liability during such proceedings, and to expand the jurisdiction of the Tax Court. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act''. SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF PERIOD OF LIMITATIONS ON FILING A CLAIM FOR CREDIT OR REFUND DURING COLLECTION ACTION PROCEEDINGS. (a) In General.--Section 6330(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``subsection (a), (b), or (c) of section 6511 (relating to limitations on credit or refund),'' after ``section 6502 (relating to collection after assessment),''. (b) Period of Limitations on Filing a Claim for Credit or Refund.-- Section 6330(e) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ``(3) Period of limitations on filing a claim for credit or refund.--In the case of the running of any period of limitations under subsection (a), (b), or (c) of section 6511 with respect to the filing of any claim for credit or refund, paragraph (1)-- ``(A) shall apply only to the extent that such credit or refund relates to an underlying tax liability properly disputed at the hearing requested under this section, and ``(B) shall not result in a suspension of the running of such period of limitations after any date on which a lapse of a deadline, a court filing, or a court order establishes that the taxpayer has forfeited or otherwise lost the right to pursue such dispute.''. (c) Cross Reference.--Section 6511(i) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: ``(8) For limitations in case of collection action proceedings, see section 6330(e).''. (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall apply to the running of any period of limitations if such period (determined without regard to the amendments made by this section) ends on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON CREDITING OF OVERPAYMENTS AGAINST DISPUTED TAX LIABILITY DURING COLLECTION ACTION PROCEEDINGS. (a) In General.--Section 6402 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: ``(o) Prohibition on Crediting of Overpayments Against Disputed Tax Liability During Collection Action Proceedings.--If a hearing is properly requested under section 6320(a)(3)(B) or 6330(a)(3)(B), and an underlying tax liability referred to in section 6330(c)(2)(B) is…
Show the remaining 456 wordsHide the remaining 456 words
properly disputed at such hearing, such tax liability shall not, except with the consent of the taxpayer, be taken into account under subsection (a) for the period during which the period of limitations for filing a claim for credit or refund relating to such tax liability is suspended by reason of section 6330(e).''. (b) Clarification of Application of Certain Levy Hearing Rules to Lien Hearings.--Section 6330(c)(2)(A) of such Code is amended by striking ``unpaid tax or the proposed levy'' and inserting ``unpaid tax, collection action, or proposed collection action''. (c) Effective Dates.-- (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any period described in section 6402(o) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by this section) if any portion of such period is after the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) Clarification of application of certain levy hearing rules to lien hearings.--The amendment made by subsection (b) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. SEC. 4. EXPANSION OF JURISDICTION OF TAX COURT. (a) In General.--Section 6330(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: ``(1) Petition for review by tax court.-- ``(A) In general.--In the case of a determination under this section, the person may, within 30 days of such determination, petition the Tax Court for review of-- ``(i) such determination, and ``(ii) any underlying tax liability referred to in subsection (c)(2)(B) which is properly disputed at the hearing in which such determination is made. ``(B) Jurisdiction of tax court.--Upon the filing of a petition, the Tax Court shall have jurisdiction with respect to-- ``(i) the determination referred to in subparagraph (A)(i), ``(ii) any underlying tax liability referred to in subparagraph (A)(ii), and ``(iii) any equitable tolling of the 30-day deadline referred to in subparagraph (A). ``(C) Retention of jurisdiction.--Upon a determination being made under this section, subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall apply whether or not the Secretary abandons the collection action or proposed collection action at issue in such determination.''. (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply with respect to petitions filed after the date of the enactment of this Act. Union Calendar No. 373 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6506 [Report No. 119-428] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend the period of limitations on filing a claim for credit or refund during collection action proceedings, to prohibit the crediting of overpayments against disputed tax liability during such proceedings, and to expand the jurisdiction of the Tax Court. _______________________________________________________________________ January 7, 2026 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
Open clean-text viewRead on Congress.gov →

Related legislation

Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.

  • HR8797To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize cooperative partnerships for mineral extraction activities at Army organic industrial base facilities, and for other purposes.
    Referred to Committee · 2026-05-13
  • HR8624To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a credit against employer payroll taxes for wages and other expenses paid or incurred for apprenticeship programs.
    Referred to Committee · 2026-04-30
  • HR7799SPONSOR Act
    Referred to Committee · 2026-03-04
  • HR7800White House Council on Fathers and Sons Act of 2026
    Referred to Committee · 2026-03-04