Ending Passenger Rail Forced Arbitration Act

Christopher R. Deluzio

Democrat · PA · Representative

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

• Brendan F. Boyle (D-PA-2)Original· 2026-05-19

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

2026-05-19

Source: Congress.gov

The proposal would prevent Amtrak from forcing passengers to sign agreements that require them to resolve disputes through private arbitration instead of going to court. This change would give train passengers the right to sue Amtrak in court if they have complaints about their service or experience injuries, rather than being locked into a private dispute-resolution process. The measure is currently under review by the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 8888 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8888 To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit Amtrak from including mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts of carriage, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 19, 2026 Mr. Deluzio (for himself and Mr. Boyle of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit Amtrak from including mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts of carriage, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Passenger Rail Forced Arbitration Act''. SEC. 2. NO VALIDITY OR ENFORCEABILITY OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS FOR CONSUMER AND CIVIL RIGHTS DISPUTES. (a) In General.--Chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Sec. 24324. Prohibition on mandatory arbitration ``(a) Purposes.--The purposes of this section are-- ``(1) to prohibit predispute arbitration agreements that force arbitration of consumer and civil rights disputes between Amtrak and customers of Amtrak; and ``(2) to prohibit agreements and practices that interfere with the right of customers to participate in a joint, class, or collective action related to consumer and civil rights disputes between Amtrak and customers of Amtrak. ``(b) Definitions.--In this section: ``(1) Amtrak.--The term `Amtrak' means the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. ``(2) Civil rights dispute.--The term `civil rights dispute' means a dispute-- ``(A) arising from an alleged violation of-- ``(i) the Constitution of the United States or the constitution of a State; or ``(ii) any Federal, State, or local law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of-- ``(I) race, sex, age, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, religion, or national origin; or ``(II) any legally protected status in education, employment, credit, housing, public accommodations and facilities, voting, veterans and servicemembers, health care, or a program funded or conducted by the Federal Government or a State government, including any law referred to or described in section 62(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including parts of such law not explicitly referenced in such section that relate to protecting individuals on any such basis; and ``(B) in which at least 1 party alleging a violation described in subparagraph (A) consists of 1 or more customers (or their authorized representative), including 1 or more individuals seeking certification as a class under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or a comparable rule or provision of State law. ``(3) Consumer dispute.--The term `consumer dispute' means any dispute, including all claims related to personal injuries, between Amtrak and 1 or more customers who seek or acquire-- ``(A) services and accommodations provided by Amtrak; or ``(B) carriage on Amtrak trains and equipment. ``(4) Customer.--The term `customer' means any individual, except for an employee of Amtrak and without regard to whether the individual is a minor or paid for the transportation, who seeks or acquires-- ``(A) services and accommodations provided by Amtrak; or ``(B) carriage on Amtrak trains and equipment. ``(5) Predispute arbitration agreement.--The term `predispute arbitration agreement' means an agreement to arbitrate a dispute that has not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement. ``(6) Predispute joint-action waiver.--The term `predispute joint-action waiver' means an agreement, whether or not part of a predispute arbitration agreement, which would prohibit, or waive the right of, 1 of the parties to the agreement to participate in…

a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative, or other forum, concerning a dispute that has not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement. ``(7) Rail passenger carrier.--The term `rail passenger carrier' means a rail carrier providing-- ``(A) intercity rail passenger transportation (as such term is defined in section 24102); or ``(B) interstate or intrastate high-speed rail (as such term is defined in section 26105) transportation, excluding a tourist, historic, scenic, or excursion rail carrier. ``(c) In General.-- ``(1) In general.--All predispute arbitration agreements and predispute joint-action waivers shall be invalid and unenforceable with respect to a consumer or civil rights dispute between Amtrak (in its capacity as a rail passenger carrier) and a customer of Amtrak. ``(2) Applicability.-- ``(A) In general.--A determination of whether this section applies to a particular dispute shall be made in accordance with Federal law. ``(B) Authority of court.--The applicability of this section to an agreement to arbitrate and the validity and enforceability of an agreement to which this section applies shall be determined by a court, rather than by an arbitrator, regardless of whether-- ``(i) the party resisting arbitration challenges the arbitration agreement specifically or in conjunction with other terms of the contract containing such agreement; and ``(ii) the agreement purports to delegate such determinations to an arbitrator. ``(C) Exclusion.--Nothing in this section may be construed to apply to a predispute arbitration agreement or joint-action waiver invoked in connection with any dispute subject to the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.).''. (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a)-- (1) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act; and (2) shall apply with respect to any dispute or claim that arises or accrues on or after such date. (c) Clerical Amendment.--The analysis for chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``24324. Prohibition on mandatory arbitration.''. <all>

• HR9091To require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment to submit a report and implement a plan for advanced manufacturing for certain critical readiness items of supply, and for other purposes.
  Referred to Committee · 2026-06-02
• HR8788Let Kids Play Act
  Referred to Committee · 2026-05-13
• HR8743SMART Kids Act
  Referred to Committee · 2026-05-12
• HR8405Railroad Retirement Fairness Act
  Referred to Committee · 2026-04-21