To require the Secretary of Energy to study new technologies and opportunities for recycling spent nuclear fuel.

Tim Moore

Republican · NC · Representative

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

• Scott H. Peters (D-CA-50)Original· 2026-06-08

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

2026-06-08

Source: Congress.gov

The federal government would be required to research new ways to recycle and reuse spent nuclear fuel from power plants instead of storing it permanently. This study would examine what technologies and methods could recover valuable materials from used nuclear fuel, potentially reducing waste and creating new resources. The research would help inform future decisions about how the U.S. handles nuclear waste and could affect energy companies, nuclear power plants, and communities near storage sites.

AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.

119 HR 9197 IH: Advancing Research in Nuclear Fuel Recycling Act U.S. House of Representatives 2026-06-08 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 9197IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJune 8, 2026Mr. Moore of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. Peters) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and CommerceA BILLTo require the Secretary of Energy to study new technologies and opportunities for recycling spent nuclear fuel. 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Advancing Research in Nuclear Fuel Recycling Act. 2.Study on new technologies to recycle spent nuclear fuel (a)DefinitionsIn this section: (1)National laboratoryThe term National Laboratory has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15801). (2)Nuclear wasteThe term nuclear waste means spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste (as defined in section 2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101)). (3)RecyclingThe term recycling means the recovery of valuable radionuclides, including fissile materials, from nuclear waste, and any subsequent processes, such as enrichment and fuel fabrication, necessary for reuse in nuclear reactors or other commercial applications. (4)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of Energy. (5)Spent nuclear fuelThe term spent nuclear fuel has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101). (b)StudyNot later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy, shall carry out a study— (1)to analyze the practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risks, including proliferation, of using dedicated recycling facilities to convert spent nuclear fuel, including spent high-assay low-enriched uranium fuel, into useable nuclear fuels, such as those for— (A)commercial light water reactors; (B)advanced nuclear reactors; and (C)medical, space-based, advanced-battery, and other non-reactor applications, as determined by the Secretary; (2) (A)to analyze the practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risks of recycling spent nuclear fuel, which is taken from temporary storage sites throughout the United States, and using it as fuel or input for advanced nuclear reactors, existing reactors, or commercial applications; (B)to compare such practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risks of recycling spent nuclear fuel with the practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risks of the once-through fuel cycle, including temporary and permanent storage requirements; and (C)to analyze the practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risks of aqueous (such as PUREX and the derivatives of PUREX) recycling processes with the practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risk of non-aqueous (such as pyro-electrochemistry) recycling processes; (3)to analyze the technical and economic feasibility of utilizing nuclear waste processing to extract certain isotopes needed for domestic and international use, including medical, industrial, space-based power source, and advanced-battery applications; (4)to analyze the practicability, potential benefits, costs, risks, and potential approaches for coupling or collocating recycling facilities with other pertinent facilities, such as advanced nuclear reactors (that can use the recycled fuel), interim storage, and fuel-fabrication facilities, including through— (A)relevant analyses, such as capital and operating cost estimates, public-private partnerships to encourage investment, infrastructure requirements, timeline to full-scale commercial deployment, and distinguishing characteristics or requirements of such facilities; (B)input from interested private technology developers and relevant assumptions regarding cost; and (C)comparison with the practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risks of the once-through fuel cycle, including temporary and permanent storage requirements; (5)to identify parties, including individuals, communities, businesses, and local and Tribal governments, that are impacted economically, or through health, safety, or environmental risks, by the current practice of indefinite temporary…

storage of spent nuclear fuel, and assess potential risks and benefits for those parties should spent nuclear fuel be removed from their sites for the purposes of nuclear waste recycling; (6)to assess different approaches for siting and sizing nuclear waste recycling facilities, including a centralized national facility, regional facilities, on-site facilities where spent nuclear fuel is currently stored, and on-site facilities where newly recycled fuel can be used by an on-site reactor, and recommend one or more approaches that consider environmental, transportation, infrastructure, capital, and other risks; (7)to identify tracking and accountability methods for new recycled fuel and radioactive waste streams for byproducts of the recycling process; (8) (A)to identify any regulatory gaps related to nuclear waste management and recycling, including accuracy and consistency of relevant definitions for radioactive waste (including high-level radioactive waste, spent nuclear fuel, low-level radioactive waste, reprocessing, recycling, and vitrification) and classifications of radioactive waste that exist in Federal law on the date of enactment of this Act; (B)to compare such definitions to those used by other nations that manage radioactive waste; and (C)to make recommendations for modernizing such definitions; and (9)to evaluate— (A)potential Federal and State-level policy changes to support development and deployment of recycling and waste-utilizing reactor technologies; and (B)impacts of spent nuclear fuel recycling on requirements for domestic nuclear waste storage. (c)ReportNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy, shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives, a report that complies with each of the following: (1)Describes the results of the study carried out under subsection (b). (2)Is released to the public. (3)Totals not more than 120 pages (excluding Front Matter, References, and Appendices) written and formatted to facilitate review by a nonspecialist readership, including the following sections: (A)A Front Matter section that includes a cover page with identifying information, tables of contents, figures, and tables. (B)An Executive Summary section. (C)An Introductory section that includes a historical overview that also explains why recycling is not performed in the United States today, such as economic, political, or technological obstacles. (D)Results and Findings sections that summarize the results and findings of the study carried out under subsection (b). (E)A Key Remaining Challenges and Barriers section that identifies key technical and nontechnical (such as economic) challenges and barriers that need to be addressed to enable scale-up and commercial adoption of spent nuclear fuel recycling, with preference given to secure, proliferation resistant, environmentally safe, and economical recycling methods. (F)A Policy Recommendations section that— (i)lists policy recommendations to address remaining technical and nontechnical (such as economic) challenges and barriers to enable scale-up and commercial adoption of spent nuclear fuel recycling, including with government support; (ii)contrasts the potential benefits and risks of each policy; and (iii)compares benefits to current or past policies. (G)An Other section in which other relevant information may be added. (H)A References section. (I)An Appendices section.

• HR4238DLARA
  Referred to Committee · 2026-06-11
• HR8856Stop Gang Violence Act
  Referred to Committee · 2026-05-15
• HR4478TRUST Act of 2025
  Passed House · 2026-05-13
• HR8182Banning Perpetrators of Religious Persecution Act of 2026
  Referred to Committee · 2026-04-02