S4766Referred to Committee

A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to establish a pilot program to evaluate the safety, quality, and qualification pathways of printable energetic feedstocks for controlled additive manufacturing applications.

Share:
Introduced
In Committee
3
Passed One Chamber
4
Passed Both
5
Signed into Law
119th
Congress
2026-06-11
Introduced
0
Cosponsors
S
Type

Sponsor

John Cornyn
John Cornyn
Republican · TX · Senator
Votes with party: 75.0% (831 recorded votes)
Top industries funding sponsor:
  • Conservative Groups$79,418k
  • Climate & Environment$24,960k

Full profile: /officials/C001056

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

Cosponsors (0)

Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.

No cosponsors on record. Bills can pass without cosponsors — this often means the sponsor introduced the bill alone, either because it's a messaging bill, a chairman's mark, or simply early in the legislative cycle.

Latest Action

The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

2026-06-11

Source: Congress.gov

Committee Activity

Currently in

Plain-English Summary

The Department of Defense would test a pilot program to evaluate whether 3D-printed explosive materials can be safely manufactured and meet quality standards for military use. The program would examine the safety risks and technical requirements needed to produce these printable energetic materials in a controlled way. This affects military personnel and defense contractors involved in weapons development and manufacturing.

AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.

Full Bill Text

Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 4766 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4766 To require the Secretary of Defense to establish a pilot program to evaluate the safety, quality, and qualification pathways of printable energetic feedstocks for controlled additive manufacturing applications. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES June 11, 2026 Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To require the Secretary of Defense to establish a pilot program to evaluate the safety, quality, and qualification pathways of printable energetic feedstocks for controlled additive manufacturing applications. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. PILOT PROGRAM ON SAFETY AND QUALIFICATION OF PRINTABLE ENERGETIC FEEDSTOCKS FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING. (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Defense shall establish a pilot program, to be carried out by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, in coordination with the Capability Program Executive, Ammunition and Energetics (or successor organization) and appropriate service acquisition executives, to evaluate the safety, quality, and qualification pathways of printable energetic feedstocks for controlled additive manufacturing applications. (b) Purpose.--The purposes of the pilot program are-- (1) to determine whether the use of printable energetic feedstocks can improve handling safety, process stability, lot- to-lot consistency, and supply chain resilience relative to traditional energetics manufacturing and handling methods; (2) to analyze the effect of printable energetic feedstocks with regards to logistics, including throughput, waste, defect rate, and constituent material availability versus state-of- the-art legacy processes; (3) to develop and validate new test and evaluation methods, if necessary, including metrology and digital quality assurance, if existing qualification pathways are insufficient to assess printable energetic feedstocks for Department of Defense use; (4) to assess applicability of printable energetic feedstocks to existing or planned munition and energetics modernization efforts, consistent with explosive safety, security, and environmental requirements that provide advantage in performance or logistics; and (5) to identify barriers to adoption, including infrastructure, standards, certification, and workforce requirements. (c) Activities.--Activities under the pilot program may include-- (1) identification, assessment, and characterization of representative printable energetic feedstocks and their performance consistency under controlled conditions; (2) development of qualification criteria and data packages to inform safety releases, waivers, or certifications as appropriate; (3) limited demonstrations at Government facilities or contractor facilities that meet all applicable explosive safety and security requirements; (4) development of nonproprietary standards, metrology approaches, and digital thread quality controls for printable energetic feedstocks; and (5) analysis of operational effects via wargaming or mission or campaign modeling and experimental performance data. (d) Comparative Safety Assessment Required.--As a core element of the pilot program, the Secretary shall conduct a comparative assessment of the safety of the use of printable energetic feedstocks relative to traditional energetics manufacturing and handling, including, at a minimum-- (1) hazards and risks associated with storage, transport, handling, and processing; (2) sensitivity and response to credible stimuli (including thermal and mechanical stimuli) using appropriate test standards; (3) process safety considerations, including potential failure modes and mitigations for controlled additive manufacturing workflows; (4) accident and incident risk modeling (including qualitative and quantitative risk assessment where feasible); and (5) recommended safety controls, facility requirements, and operational constraints for any future operational use. (e) Safety and Security Requirements.--The Secretary shall ensure that activities under the pilot program-- (1) are conducted only at facilities compliant with applicable explosive safety siting, storage, handling, and operating requirements; (2) incorporate counter-diversion safeguards, inventory accountability, and chain-of-custody controls; and (3) do not authorize dissemination
Show the remaining 172 words
of restricted manufacturing parameters outside approved Government and cleared-industry channels. (f) Reporting.--Not later than 180 days after initiation of the pilot program, and annually thereafter for the duration of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes-- (1) pilot objectives, participants, test locations, and safety governance structure; (2) test methodologies, standards used, and key safety and quality metrics; (3) results of activities conducted under subsection (c), including identification, assessment, and characterization of representative printable energetic feedstocks, demonstrations, qualification criteria, data packages, and standards development; (4) results of the comparative safety assessment required under subsection (d), including identified hazards, mitigations, and residual risk; (5) an assessment of cost, schedule, and scalability relative to traditional energetics manufacturing and handling; (6) recommended qualification and certification pathways, including any standards gaps; and (7) any recommended legislative, regulatory, or resourcing actions required to enable safe adoption. (g) Termination.--The pilot program shall terminate before the date that is two years after the date of the enactment of this Act. <all>