A bill to require the Secretary of the Army to issue guidance relating to the review of applications for alteration or temporary or permanent occupation or use of certain hydropower projects, and for other purposes.

Steve Daines

Republican · MT · Senator

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

• Margaret Wood Hassan (D-NH)Original· 2026-07-15

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

2026-07-15

Source: Congress.gov

The Army Secretary would have to create clear rules for how the government reviews requests from companies or individuals who want to change, temporarily use, or permanently use existing hydropower dams and water projects. This would make the approval process more consistent and transparent for businesses and organizations that depend on these facilities for power generation or water management. The bill affects hydropower companies, dam operators, and anyone seeking to modify how these water projects are used.

AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 4992 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4992 To require the Secretary of the Army to issue guidance relating to the review of applications for alteration or temporary or permanent occupation or use of certain hydropower projects, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES July 15, 2026 Mr. Daines (for himself and Ms. Hassan) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To require the Secretary of the Army to issue guidance relating to the review of applications for alteration or temporary or permanent occupation or use of certain hydropower projects, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. STANDARDIZED REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR HYDROPOWER PROJECTS. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Completeness review.--The term ``completeness review'' means a review by the Secretary (or a designee) regarding whether a section 408 application is complete. (2) Hydropower project.--The term ``hydropower project'' means any non-Federal hydropower project requiring a license or exemption under the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.). (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Army. (4) Section 408 application.--The term ``section 408 application'' means an application relating to a hydropower project for permission under section 14 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1152, chapter 425; 33 U.S.C. 408), for an alteration, or temporary or permanent occupation or use, described in subsection (a) of that section. (b) Standardized Review Procedures.-- (1) Mandatory guidance.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidance establishing the following: (A) Application checklist.--A standardized checklist of required materials for section 408 applications, to be developed in consultation with-- (i) the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; (ii) the Hydroelectric Design Center of the Corps of Engineers; (iii) hydropower project operators; and (iv) relevant industry associations. (B) Completeness criteria.--A clear description of what constitutes a complete section 408 application, including with respect to-- (i) required documents and analyses; (ii) formatting and submission requirements; and (iii) evidence of compliance with any applicable Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license. (C) Phased review procedures.--For section 408 applications for which a phased design review is required-- (i) the specific scope and objectives of each review phase; (ii) a timeline for each review phase; (iii) an applicable definition of the terms ``fatal flaw'', ``final quality assurance'', and ``technical review''; and (iv) a clear statement that a completeness review shall not include-- (I) detailed technical analysis; or (II) any engineering-related judgment with respect to design adequacy. (D) Escalation procedures.--Procedures for referring a section 408 application to the head of the applicable Division Office of the Corps of Engineers or an official at the Corps of Engineers headquarters in any case in which a deadline applicable to the section 408 application is not met. (2) Scope of completeness reviews.--The guidance issued under paragraph (1) shall establish that a completeness review shall be limited to verification that-- (A) all required documents have been submitted; (B) those documents are in the required format; and (C) the section 408 application addresses the applicable requirements of the checklist under paragraph (1)(A). (3) Prohibitions.--In conducting a completeness review, the Secretary (or a designee) may not-- (A) conduct a detailed technical review of any engineering calculations; (B) evaluate the design adequacy of, or alternative approaches to, the hydropower project that is the subject of the section 408 application; (C)…

request any design modification to, or additional analysis of, the hydropower project that is the subject of the section 408 application; (D) consider any factor other than a factor included in the standardized checklist under paragraph (1)(A); or (E) require compliance with any environmental standard that was not established by a Federal or relevant State agency before the date of submission of the section 408 application. <all>

• S1175Small County PILT Parity Act
  Referred to Committee · 2026-07-16
• SRES798A resolution designating June 2026 as "Great Outdoors Month".
  Referred to Committee · 2026-07-14
• SRES795A resolution commemorating the 150th anniversary of the Battle of the Little Bighorn.
  Introduced · 2026-06-24
• SRES787A resolution celebrating the historic anniversary of the June 24, 2022, decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
  Referred to Committee · 2026-06-24