To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from using Federal funds to engage in discriminatory profiling, and for other purposes.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Democrat · FL · Representative

Source: Congress.gov · FEC

No cosponsors on record. Bills can pass without cosponsors — this often means the sponsor introduced the bill alone, either because it's a messaging bill, a chairman's mark, or simply early in the legislative cycle.

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

2026-07-30

Source: Congress.gov

The proposal would ban the Department of Homeland Security from using federal money to conduct profiling based on characteristics like race, religion, ethnicity, or national origin when enforcing immigration and security laws. This would affect how DHS agents conduct investigations, searches, and enforcement actions, requiring them to base decisions on individual behavior and evidence rather than demographic characteristics. The measure is currently under review by congressional committees to determine its final form.

AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 10011 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 10011 To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from using Federal funds to engage in discriminatory profiling, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 30, 2026 Ms. Wasserman Schultz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from using Federal funds to engage in discriminatory profiling, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``No Person's Race, Ethnicity, Job, or Use of Dialect or Inflection is Cause for Enforcement Act'' or the ``No PREJUDICE Act''. SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISCRIMINATORY PROFILING BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (a) Limitation on Use of Federal Funds.--No officer or employee of the Department of Homeland Security, or a person acting under the authority of the Department of Homeland Security, may seize, detain, or arrest an individual, or subject an individual to routine or spontaneous investigatory activities on the basis of any of the following, or any combination thereof: (1) The actual or perceived race, color, religion, sex, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or ethnicity of the individual. (2) The presence of that individual at a location associated with the recruitment or transportation of individuals for informal or temporary employment, including bus stops, car washes, or agricultural sites. (3) Participation by that individual in a particular hobby, leisure activity, job, or career. (4) The use of Spanish or any language other than English, or the use of English with an accent, by that individual. (b) Immigration Proceedings.-- (1) Request for hearing.--An alien who in removal proceedings under the immigration laws (as such term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)) may request a hearing in the appropriate district court of the United States to determine whether the prohibition under subsection (a) was violated with respect to the alien. (2) Dismissal.--If the district judge determines that the prohibition under subsection (a) was violated with respect to the alien, the judge shall dismiss the removal proceedings against the alien. (3) Remand.--If the district judge determines that the prohibition under subsection (a) was not violated with respect to the alien, the judge shall remand the case to the immigration court for further removal proceedings. <all>

• HR10010Build Homes, Not Hate Act of 2026
  Referred to Committee · 2026-07-30
• HR4541To reauthorize the Young Women’s Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009.
  Passed House · 2026-07-27
• HR9944TPS Review Act
  Referred to Committee · 2026-07-23
• HRES1445Condemning the attack on the Argentine Jewish Mutual Association Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in July 1994, and encouraging accountability for the attack.
  Referred to Committee · 2026-07-21