
Full profile: /officials/D000622
Source: Congress.gov · FEC
Members who have signed on to support this bill since introduction. Source: Congress.gov.
The most recent step in the bill's legislative path. Committee Activity below shows referrals and reports; the full action-by-action history including floor proceedings lives at Congress.gov →
Currently in
The Pentagon would be required to create a detailed plan for how the U.S. military should respond to crises and conflicts that might occur in the South China Sea, a strategically important shipping route where multiple countries have competing territorial claims. This strategy would help guide military decision-making and coordination if tensions escalate in the region, affecting military personnel, defense policy, and potentially international relations with countries like China, Vietnam, and the Philippines. The bill is currently under review by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
AI-assisted summary generated from the official bill metadata (title, subjects, actions) sourced from Congress.gov. Cached and reviewed. Always verify against the official text linked below.
Verbatim text published on Congress.gov via GovInfo. Use Cmd+F / Ctrl+F to search within this excerpt.
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [S. 4609 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4609 To require the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy for crisis management in the South China Sea, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES May 20, 2026 Ms. Duckworth (for herself and Mr. Curtis) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To require the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy for crisis management in the South China Sea, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Strategy for Crisis Management Act of 2026''. SEC. 2. STRATEGY FOR CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN SOUTH CHINA SEA. (a) Crisis Defined.--In this section, the term ``crisis'' means an incident or situation that creates a condition of such national security importance that the President or the Secretary of Defense may consider a commitment of the United States Armed Forces or Department resources, or the initiation of activities by the Department of Defense, to achieve or defend national objectives. (b) Strategy.--The Secretary of Defense shall develop a strategy for crisis management in the South China Sea that-- (1) identifies the exact locations of the most likely flashpoints in the South China Sea that could lead to scenarios of crises short of war that would require heightened interagency and international coordination; and (2) includes, for each major likely flashpoint, a crisis playbook with sequenced response options and a plan for coordination with foreign partners. (c) Objectives.--The strategy required by subsection (b) shall be designed-- (1) to deny the aim of the People's Republic of China and deter further People's Republic of China provocation or actions that expand the crisis; (2) to ensure the safety of United States citizens and residents in the region and in the United States; (3) to ensure the safety of members of the United States Armed Forces in the region, including safety from accidents; (4) to preserve United States economic interests in the region, including protecting key trade and commerce routes; (5) to protect United States national security interests, including by upholding treaty obligations and protecting allies and partners; and (6) to manage possible escalation into combat operations by taking opportunities for de-escalation and maintaining strategic stability. (d) Crisis Playbooks.-- (1) In general.--Each crisis playbook required by subsection (b)(2)-- (A) shall be developed by the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the applicable Chief of Mission, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the head of any other relevant agency; and (B) shall be informed by the intelligence community and relevant experts. (2) Elements.--Each crisis playbook shall include the following: (A) A list of specific indicators that would elevate a scenario from a baseline of gray-zone conditions to the level of a crisis. (B) Not less than one planning scenario that could lead to crisis, with clearly identified assumptions, phases, and likely branches. (C) Anticipated decision points and recommended options, sequenced across all identified phases. The Secretary of Defense shall consider at least the following types of recommended options: (i) Response options for Department action, across the range of possible decisions across the Department, including force employment, military posture, Department official statements or travel, engagements or public announcements, capability demonstrations or tests. (ii) Recommendations for types of ongoing Department activities to consider ceasing, reducing, or changing in scale or…
type. (iii) Diplomatic and economic options, developed in coordination with the Secretary of State, the applicable Chief of Mission, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the head of any other relevant agency, to accompany the options for the Department. (D) Each option recommended under subparagraph (C) shall include a cost-benefit-risk analysis, specifically-- (i) the projected benefit of the option; (ii) the assessed risk to members of the United States Armed Forces; (iii) the estimated financial cost; (iv) the projected humanitarian impact, including the impact on local civilians; (v) the projected impact to escalation risk; and (vi) any accompanying risk mitigation strategies. (E) A list of possible off-ramps, including a description of indicators of such off-ramps and recommendations of options for the Secretary of Defense to take advantage of such off-ramps. (F) An engagement plan-- (i) for streamlined communication and coordination with relevant foreign partners during each phase of the crisis to design collective diplomatic, economic and military responses to People's Republic of China coercion and avoid potential actions that could unnecessarily provoke or exacerbate a tense situation; and (ii) that identifies recommendations for specific immediate actions the Secretary of Defense should take now to pre-coordinate with foreign partners. (e) Semiannual Review.--Not less frequently than semiannually, the Secretary of Defense shall review, update as necessary, and validate each crisis playbook developed under subsection (b)(2). (f) Interim Report.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a progress report that-- (A) details the list of locations and scenarios identified under subsection (b)(1); (B) provides a status update on the development of the crisis playbook required by subsection (b)(2); (C) sets forth a plan for the completion of such playbooks not later than March 2027; and (D) details the process by which such playbooks will be reviewed, updated as necessary, and validated under subsection (e). (2) Form.--The interim report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. (g) Report.-- (1) In general.--Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate the House of Representatives a report that summarizes the strategy developed under subsection (b). (2) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. (h) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section may be construed to require the options set forth in a playbook developed under subsection (b)(2) to be the only options considered or followed in a crisis scenario. <all>
Bills by the same sponsor or covering overlapping subjects.